In the email communication regarding the case of Rosemary Powers vs Jerome Pintaro, Judge Cerne is accused of improper ex parte communication by contacting one party without involving the others, violating constitutional rights. The judge is criticized for presiding over hearings without all parties present and issuing fraudulent orders. The defendant, Jerome Pintaro, expresses his intention to address the judge's misconduct with attorney David A. Belofsky.
[Source: Page 1]
The email exchange highlights past instances where Judge Cerne allegedly made decisions without proper authority or jurisdiction, granting void orders to the plaintiffs in the case. The defendant references similar actions taken by the judge in a previous case involving himself and his wife during quarantine in August 2022. The defendant emphasizes the judge's repeated violations of due process and civil rights.
[Source: Page 2]
Further correspondence includes an attached order from Judge Cerne continuing the case to a future date. The defendant, Jerome Pintaro, responds to this email, asserting the judge's wrongdoing and indicating his intention to involve attorney David A. Belofsky in addressing the matter.
[Source: Page 3]