SUMMARY JUDGEMENT MATTER OF LAW
SUMMARY JUDGEMENT MATTER OF LAW
Summary Judgement Matter of Law
Case Overview
The case involves a motion for summary judgment as a matter of law in a civil action for deprivation of rights pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The plaintiff challenges void judgments and orders issued by the 18th Judicial Circuit Court, alleging lack of jurisdiction over the plaintiff trust. The complaint highlights flaws in the legal process and questions the authenticity of the plaintiff trust and its authority to bring foreclosure actions.
(Page 1-2)
Legal Arguments
The motion to vacate default judgments and foreclosure sale raises issues of jurisdiction and the lack of a legally appointed trustee to act on behalf of the plaintiff trust. The court's denial of challenges to void judgments is contested based on constitutional grounds of procedural due process failures. The plaintiff argues that fraudulent practices, including the use of fictitious buyers and misrepresentations, have tainted the judicial proceedings.
(Page 3-4)
Supreme Court Ruling
A recent U.S. Supreme Court ruling emphasized property rights and the ability of property owners to seek redress in federal court for violations of the Fifth Amendment. The case of Knick v. Township of Scott set a precedent allowing individuals to directly sue in federal court without exhausting state court remedies when facing property takings without just compensation. This decision underscores the importance of protecting property rights and ensuring fair legal processes.
(Page 5-6)
