In this legal document, the defendants, represented by Dimitri A. Sayegh, Majd G. Khoury, and Adham Alaily, are requesting to be dismissed from the case based on the Plaintiffs' response to the motion to dismiss. The Defendants argue that the Plaintiffs' response fails to provide sufficient explanations and facts to support their claims, instead relying on conclusions without a plausible cause of action. They highlight that the exhibits presented by the Plaintiffs suggest an attempt to re-litigate a state court case, indicating that no federal question exists. The Defendants seek the dismissal of the Complaint with prejudice, or alternatively, request the Plaintiffs to provide a proposed amended complaint that adheres to the rules and outlines the jurisdictional and factual basis of their claims.