In a recent docket entry, the Honorable Thomas M. Durkin addressed the Plaintiff's motion for reconsideration regarding the Court's denial of the motion for recusal. The Plaintiff argued for recusal based on disagreements with the Court's decisions, specifically regarding a default judgment. However, the Court reiterated that such disagreements do not warrant recusal and therefore denied the motion for reconsideration. This decision was made in accordance with legal precedents, emphasizing that recusal is not justified solely based on disagreement with substantive or case management decisions.
(Page 1)