Summary of Legal Case: Jerome Pintaro v. Gerald Granada

Plaintiff's Response to Defendant's Motion to Dismiss

In this legal case, Jerome Pintaro responds to Gerald Granada's Motion to Dismiss. Pintaro's attorney, Hal B. Dworkin, submitted the response, emphasizing the importance of precedent court decisions in providing predictability, stability, fairness, and efficiency in the law. Precedent court decisions play a vital role in guiding future judicial rulings and ensuring consistency in the application of the law. The Supreme Court's past cases hold significant weight due to being the final authority in the justice system, influencing the interpretation and limitations of governmental powers.

(Page 1-2)

Certification and Compliance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 11

Jerome Pintaro certifies the compliance of his motion with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 11, ensuring that the presented motion is not for improper purposes, is supported by existing law or a valid argument, has evidentiary support, and meets all the requirements of Rule 11. By signing below, Pintaro affirms the accuracy and legitimacy of the motion, dated August 7, 2023.

(Page 3)

GRANADA - Flipbook by Fleepit